Sunday, October 15, 2023

“At War with a Death Cult” by Brian Henry

Israeli victims on stretchers

In Hamas’s latest war against Israel, the media began its game of keeping score on Day 1. As I write these words, the CBC says the score stands at more than 1,000 people killed in Israel and 830 killed in Gaza and the West Bank.

The score card makes it sound as if both sides are suffering the same kind of casualties, with the numbers being the only difference. That’s a media lie.

The 1,000 dead in Israel were murdered. The overwhelming majority were civilians – 260 of them young men and women enjoying an outdoor music concert. Others were children, infants even. Others were elderly. Often entire families – mother, father, and children – were slaughtered all together.

In Gaza, most of the dead are terrorists – members of Hamas or Islamic Jihad. On the Israeli side, the dead are victims. On the Palestinian side, the dead are the criminals who murdered them – the murderers, their accomplices, and the leaders who planned and ordered this mass atrocity.

And they are not only murderers. The terrorists went through southern Israel committing rape and gang rape, torturing people, disfiguring the dead, kidnapping men, women and children to use as hostages – filming it and uploading it to social media for the loved ones of the victims to watch. These are the terrorists being killed in Gaza.

The more of them killed, the better the world will be.

Civilians are also dying in Gaza. But like every modern, civilized nation – like Canada and the UK in Afghanistan, for example – Israel works to minimize civilian casualties. In every war, though, civilians die.

Israeli child's bed

Here in Canada, we’ve had the luxury of forgetting how war works. To begin a war is to unleash untold death and destruction. The aggressor kills not only its enemy, but inevitably and always brings misery and death to its own side, as well. 

The real score card should read that, to date, Hamas has murdered 1,000 Israelis, and Hamas has caused the deaths of 830 Palestinians, as well – mostly terrorists, but civilians, too.

And while in all wars the aggressor bears the responsibility for the deaths, injuries, and destruction on both sides, in a war like this, Hamas is doubly responsible for all civilian deaths.

On most battlefields, it’s possible to create some distance between fighters and civilians. Hamas’s strategy is to embed itself entirely within the civilian population. Hamas sets up command posts in apartment buildings, headquarters in hospitals, and stores arms beneath schools and houses. All of Gaza City stands on two layers: citizens above and a warren of Hamas tunnels hidden below.

Hamas’s aim is to make it impossible to hit them without also hitting civilians. Thus, for example, Israel tells the Palestinians in the north of Gaza to go south, trying to create some distance between fighters and civilians. Hamas tells Gazans to stay in place, so that when Israel moves in to destroy Hamas {as it must if Israelis are ever to sleep again} the civilian death toll will skyrocket. 

We should remember, though, that the Gaza Health Ministry is run by Hamas, and Hamas vets every word doctors in Gaza say to journalists. So numbers of causalities coming out of Gaza aren’t reliable – especially the number of civilian casualties. In all previous conflicts with Hamas, many of the supposed civilian deaths turned out to be Hamas terrorists, and many child deaths turned out to be young men or teens Hamas had enlisted into its ranks.

Why did Hamas attack now?

There are complicated answers: Hamas attacked because Iran told them to. To sink the Israeli-Saudi peace agreement that was in the offing.Or because Iran is ready for a war with Israel and this is how they’re starting it. Who knows.

There’s also a simple answer: Because Hamas was ready. Hamas has been preparing for war against Israel since the end of the last round they instigated back in 2021. This is just what Hamas does. 

Hamas kidnapping Israeli woman

Hamas attacks because they want to destroy Israel. And because killing Israelis, killing Jews, makes them happy.

Hamas doesn’t make a secret of this. Most countries have a foundational document. In the British North America Act, Canada aspires to “peace order and good government.” In its foundational document, its Covenant, Hamas aspires to the day when the trees will call out, “There is a Jew behind me. Come and kill him” (Article 7 here.)

Hamas Interior Minister Fathi said: “We will cleanse Palestine of the filth of the Jews. We will establish the Caliphate, after the nation has been healed of its cancer—the Jews.” There are many similar statements by many other leaders of Hamas.

Hamas is not what you or I think of as a political party. It’s a Jew-hating death cult. When Hamas succeeds in murdering a Jewish mother and child, they celebrate. They hand out sweets on the streets of Gaza.

{Alas, not only in Gaza. On hearing of the mass murder of Israelis, Hamas’s supporters were dancing in the streets of Mississauga and handing out candy in Montreal. See here and here. Not to mention the demonstrations in support of Hamas in all major Canadian cities and the statements of support from CUPE, student unions, professors, and the other Nazis in out midst.}

It's hard to wrap our heads around the idea of people so depraved that they delight in murder, rape and torture, who burn people alive and riddle babies with rifle fire. But it’s not only Jews whose deaths Hamas seeks. They seek their own deaths, too.

Israeli infant and others in body bags

In Gaza, children are raised from infancy to aspire to martyrdom. When Hamas terrorists get their wish, their deaths are glorified – often by their own parents, who pledge to bring up younger siblings to follow a dead brother’s example. 

“We love death like Israelis love life,” said Hamas commander Muhammad Deif on al-Aqsa TV (here). This is the Muhammad Deif who’s believed to have planned this mass terrorist attack on Israel. Many other Hamas leaders have said the same. 

Seeking death, they say – their own deaths and the deaths of Jews – is commanded by Islam. 

{I can only the imagine the horror of most Muslims at this sanctification of murder.}

This glorification of death dates back to the fusion of radical Islamism and Nazism in the 1930s and is shared among all the Islamist terrorist groups: Hamas, Islamic Jihad, al Qada, ISIS, and the rest.

That is what Israel is fighting.

On the other hand, Jews do love life. Since Bergen Belsen was liberated in 1945, Am Yisrael Chai, “The people of Israel live!” has been our rallying cry. This is more than a cry of unity and a cry of defiance to our enemies; it also is a commandment: The people of Israel must live. That is why the Israel Defence Forces are moving into Gaza and why Jews in Israel and the diaspora, secular and religious, right and left are united in support. Life must be defended.

***

In Israel, January 2023

Brian Henry is a writer, editor, creative writing instructor, and publisher of the Quick Brown Fox blog. He’s written opinion pieces for the National Post and the Toronto Star. He was also a regular contributor to the (now defunct) Jewish Tribune and the Engage and Harry’s Place websites in the UK.

This piece, "At war with a death cult," also appeared in TheJ.ca, a Jewish Canadian Journal of news and commentary (here). 


Friday, January 13, 2023

"To become antisemites, Canadian kids go to university" by Brian Henry

Dr. Ayelet Kuper

A new report has revealed stunning antisemitism at the University of Toronto’s Temerty Faculty of Medicine (TFOM). Following years of complaints from faculty, staff and students, the medical school took the unprecedented step of appointing a Senior Advisor on Antisemitism. The appointee, Dr. Ayelet Kuper, recently published her report as a peer-reviewed article in the Canadian Medical Education Journal (here).  

Among numerous instances of antisemitism, Dr. Kuper reports being told: “All Jews are liars; that Jews lie to control the university or the faculty or the world, to oppress or hurt others, and/or for other forms of gain; and that antisemitism can’t exist because everything Jews say are lies, including any claims to have experienced discrimination.”

The mainstream media noticed the report, but barely.

The CBC, which covers equity and diversity, race and racism 24/7 published one opinion piece on its website. Nothing on the news. Nothing on As It Happens, Metro Morning, or the Current. Ironically the one CBC piece is titled: “Does antisemitism count?” Clearly, not at the CBC.

The CBC and other pieces in the mainstream media picked up on the lack of support Jews receive from the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) crowd, but what Dr. Kuper reports is not mere lack of support, but Jew-hatred coming most especially from “EDI-related spaces.”

Dr. Kuper relates that a faculty member told her “Jews mustn’t be allowed to speak on their own behalf about antisemitism and shouldn’t even be subject to the protection from discrimination as outlined in the Ontario Human Rights Code on the grounds that what Jews call antisemitism isn’t real.”

Off campus, antisemites also use the strategy of saying
"any Jew who calls them out is just racist and is lying
 in order to oppress Palestinians." 
In 2021, Toronto School Board Trustee Alexandra Lulka
was investigated for anti-Palestinian racism because she
objected to a teacher distributing grossly antisemitc
material. See here.

“More specifically,” Dr. Kuper says, “I experienced the now-common strategy among those at TFOM who have made what I believe to be antisemitic statements to say that any Jew who calls them out is just racist and is lying in order to oppress Palestinians; this strategy was reportedly also explicitly taught to TFOM learners by faculty members during an off-campus event.”[i]

Another faculty member told Dr. Kuper antisemitism could not be addressed in a teaching session about Equity Diversity and Inclusion “because such teaching might normalize the existence of a Jewish state in Israel, which would be beyond the bounds of acceptable speech.”

While Zionism simply means support for Israel’s existence, Dr. Kuper notes, “There are those at TFOM who have insisted (to me and to others) that this term means various racist and hateful things, ranging from ‘hating all Muslims’ to ‘wanting to murder all Palestinians.’ Such false definitions are then used to justify hatred of any Jews who ‘admit’ to being Zionists” – which means just about all Jews.

Dr. Kuper writes that, in her experience, “the longstanding myth of ‘Jewish power’” is “the traditional antisemitic trope that is … invoked at TFOM more often than any other.”

By way of specific example, she writes: “When a lecture on religious discrimination was instituted within the medical school in the spring of 2021, I was asked by non-Jewish learners why content about Jews was ‘being forced on the students by the Jew who bought the Faculty.’ Those learners explained that they meant James Temerty, who with his wife had made a sizeable donation to the Faculty (which was subsequently renamed in their honour), and who is not Jewish” – but was assumed to be Jewish because of his wealth.

Within the medical school, Dr. Kuper also heard that Jews “control CaRMS (the Canadian Residency Matching Service, which manages the residency selection process), Jews control faculty hiring, and Jews control TFOM’s promotion decisions.”

And she notes: “a pervasive belief in certain circles of faculty members and learners that anyone at TFOM who angers ‘the Jews’ will have their career destroyed by ‘the Jews’ – and I have had it explained to me on multiple occasions that this fear of Jews, instead of being a bias to be combatted, is actually the reverse: that those who fear Jews based on this egregious stereotype are actually the ones being discriminated against, since they have to cope with their fear of ‘the powerful Jews.’”

Most people, normal people, have a hard time wrapping our heads around antisemitism. We find it especially hard to comprehend well-educated people as antisemites – doctors for God’s sake! 

For example, in her otherwise excellent opinion piece (the single piece about this outrageous racism published by the Globe and Mail), Marsha Lederman remarks: “If the current and future doctors of Canada think this way, what do less educated members of our society think of ‘the Jews’?”

This is precisely backwards. In Canada, the less educated generally have no problem with Jews. To learn antisemitism, Canadian kids go to university.

The dominant ideology of Critical Theory – which Dr. Kuper subscribes to (as do many professors these day) is a post-modern conspiracy theory.

Dr. Kuper provides a précis: “At TFOM we teach our medical students in their first-year lectures about race as a social (not biological) construct that has been set up as an act of power, to locate and maintain power within certain groups of people while oppressing or dehumanizing other groups of people. Like many medical educators, we specifically talk about whiteness as being about power.”[ii]

That is, white people have conspired to oppress and dehumanize everyone else (though perhaps not on purpose  the oppression reproduces itself in mysterious ways). But while Dr. Kuper believes in all this, she protests that Jews aren’t white. This is true: Jews come in all colours, and certainly we do not define ourselves as a race – white or otherwise.

But whether Jews are white or not depends on where a racist stands on the political spectrum. On the racist far right, white is good, and Jews aren’t. On the left, within the ideology of Critical Theory, white is bad, and so what are Jews…?

Anyone with the least familiarity with Jewish history can’t be surprised that Jews have ended up in the bad column. Of course, our new Critical Theorists see Jews as oppressors! The new ideology maps seamlessly onto the old myths of Jewish power, Jewish money, and Jewish conspiracy.

Although white people are the villains of Critical Theory, it's also true that most adherents to this ideology are white themselves, and I'd suggest this mitigates the animosity – white people as a group aren't demonized, aren't presented as being outside of humanity altogether. But while the Critical Theorists see Jews as white, Jews are also obviously not white  both a white oppressor and also something worse, a distinct group that can be demonized. 

Why has this happened? In part because the old antisemitic myths lie dormant everywhere in our culture, waiting to be picked up by any belief system susceptible to them – which Critical Theory has proved itself to be, not just at the University of Toronto, but throughout Canada, the United States, and the UK.  

But why? Again, perhaps because Critical Theory already resembles antisemitism: it's a conspiracy theory that ascribes all power to one group, a group that's privileged by its wealth, and Critical Theory believes all social evil flows out of this basic dichotomy between the oppressor group and the oppressed. Once Jews are named as the oppressor group, then this is simply the traditional antisemitic myth.

Moreover, the new ideology has inherited the antisemitic beliefs of its predecessors on the left. Israel has long been seen on the left as uniquely evil – the only country in the world whose destruction is routinely called for (and the further left you go, the truer this is). The left has seen Israel as racist – and as irreparably racist because while, for others, national self-determination is seen as a human right, for Jews and only Jews, it’s called racist.

Click on photos to enlarge them.

Dating back to Edward Said, Critical Theory has also accused Israel of being a settler colonial state – making Jews the one and only indigenous group called a colonial power in our own land. 

The new ideology has fully taken on these antisemitic lies and has recently added the twist that as “whites” Jews are oppressing the “brown” Palestinians.

Some people who believe in the new ideology argue that Jews belong in the good, oppressed column, not the bad, oppressor column – as does Dr. Kuper. After all, Jews have been frequently persecuted throughout history and Israel is a tiny liberal democracy continually attacked by much larger nations; it ought to be obvious which side of any oppressed-oppressor dichotomy Jews fall on.

But emotion drives movements, not reason.

For the new ideology, antisemitism is the norm. Thus, Dr. Kuper is isolated among the EDI crowd. She writes: I’ve been told by colleagues that being born in Israel and refusing to denounce the existence of my place of birth as a Jewish state means that I am inherently racist and that any discrimination I encounter as a Jew in Canada is therefore deserved.”

At U of T, students are similarly excluded based on their attachment to Israel. Dr. Kuper reports: “Jewish learners have been forced to express their beliefs about Israel and/or Zionism prior to being allowed to participate in university activities.”

This is not just a U of T phenomena. For example, when the terrorist group Hamas launched a war against Israel in 2011, two dozen Gender Studies departments at universities across Canada published an open letter declaring their solidarity with Hamas and saying: “Anti-colonial activism informs the foundation of our discipline.” Or in other words: if you support Israel, you don’t belong in gender studies. {See here.}

Again, for almost all Jews, attachment to Israel is part of our identity – and it’s a part of our identity that the new ideology routinely demonizes.

Educated antisemites are nothing new. 

Antisemitism has always been the preferred bigotry of those who see themselves as the in-crowd, the people who enjoy feeling superior – intellectually, culturally, racially, or morally. At our universities, the antisemites seem to be most especially pleased by their imagined moral superiority.

Of course, the uneducated also sometimes see themselves as superior. Hitler had about a Grade 8 education. But while Hitler was no intellectual, German intellectuals were strongly pro-Nazi. Even before Hitler rose to power in 1933, most student groups were already Nazis. A swastika pin showed you were one of the cool kids. And when Hitler did come to power, faculty at universities across Germany applauded.

Martin Heidegger, chancellor of Freiberg University and foremost German philosopher of the 20th Century, stated: “The Fuhrer himself and he alone is German reality and its law, today and for the future.” 

Heidegger’s main philosophical concern was man’s “being-in-the-world.” But Jews, he wrote in his notebooks, are “worldless,” a status lower than animals. According to Heidegger, ontologically speaking, Jews don’t belong in existence at all. In the context of the Holocaust this gives me chills.

At the Wannsee Conference called to lay down the strategy for the murder of Europe’s Jews, seven of the fifteen attendees held doctorates – and this in an age when PhDs were rare.

Hanukkah, which we’ve been celebrating recently, commemorates the success of the Jewish rebellion against our Syrian-Greek rulers. In the last centuries before the Christian era, Greek culture dominated the Middle East. It was the very height of culture.

As the American novelist and essayist Dara Horn points out, “Judaism is a counter culture,”[iii] and because of that, throughout the ages, dominant cultures pick on the Jews – because we show there’s another way. And when you know you represent the height of culture or you’re establishing a thousand-year Reich, or you’re woke and on the right side of history, a counter culture looks like a manifestation of evil – or at least an annoying challenge to your superiority.

In 168 BCE, the Greeks decided to no longer put up with these primitive Jews and banned Jewish practice. That ignited the Maccabean revolt which ended with the re-establishment of an independent Jewish kingdom.

But before that happy ending and the subsequent establishment of Hanukkah, even some Jews thought the Greeks had everything right. To become Greek, they underwent surgery to reverse their circumcisions – this at a time with no effective pain killers or antibiotics, when such surgery wouldn’t just hurt; it could kill you. There’s no limit it seems to what some people will do to hang out with the cool kids and, specifically in the 2nd Century BCE, to play sports in the nude as all superior people did.

These days it’s easier for Jews to hang out with the cool kids. Jews don’t need to mutilate their penises, just their souls. In her report on antisemitism as the U of T medical school, Dr. Kuper notes a small number of Jews at TFOM who have joined the antisemites. She says, “Some of them described to me a deep embarrassment at being Jewish.” 

The antisemites hide behind these co-opted Jews. “Their being Jewish is often used by them and by their non-Jewish colleagues to claim that what they are all saying or doing can’t possibly be antisemitic,” says Dr. Kuper, a process she describes as “Jew-washing.”

We know such co-opted Jews have been weaponized by our enemies for the past 2200 years (and doubtless longer).  They're difficult to deal with, but they come and they go. The Jews remain.

In the meanwhile, the new ideology represents a grave danger, particularly as its’s being taught throughout the university system and increasingly in high schools, with its attitudes leaking down to the grade school level.

On the bright side, we should remember that, although this new ideology demonizes Jews, encourages bad behaviour and invites people to enjoy the pleasures of bullying while feeling morally superior about it, most Canadians don’t want to be bullies. For the moment, most of us are mostly safe.

***

Notes:

[i] The strategy of accusing Jews who protest antisemitism of being racist also gets used outside universities. In 2022, Toronto Board of Education Trustee Alexandra Lulka objected to a teacher distributing material that was grossly antisemitic and that praised terrorists and terrorism. For this, and although she made no mention of Palestinians at all, Lulka was accused of anti-Palestinian racism. An investigator concluded she was guilty and Lulka avoided official censure only because a narrow majority of her fellow Trustees had the sense to see that objecting to antisemitism is not racism. See here.

[ii] Critical Theory includes Critical Race Theory, Post-Colonial Theory, Queer Theory, and Intersectional Feminist Theory. For a good read on the evolution of Postmodernism into this pervasive ideology, see Cynical Theories: How activist scholarship made everything about race, gender and identity … and why this harms everybody  by Helen Pluckrose & James Lindsay (see here).   

[iii] For my analysis of Hanukkah, I’ve relied heavily on Dara Horn. If you haven’t yet read her, do run out and buy People Love Dead Jews: Reports from a Haunted Present (available here) or start by reading Yair Rosenberg’s conversation with her on Deep Shtetl in The Atlantic (here).

Brian Henry is a writer, editor, creative writing instructor, and publisher of the Quick Brown Fox blog. He’s written opinion pieces for the National Post and the Toronto Star. He was also a regular contributor to the (now defunct) Jewish Tribune and the Engage and Harry’s Place websites in the UK.

An earlier version of this piece, titled “Antisemites at the U of T medical school and the danger of the new ideology" previously appeared in TheJ.ca.

 

Sunday, September 11, 2022

Israel: A simple guide to the most misunderstood country on earth by Noa Tishby reviewed by Brian Henry

Israel: A simple guide to the most misunderstood country on earth by Noa Tishby Simon & Schuster, 2021, 333 pages. Available from Chapters here.

Noa Tishby’s Israel: A simple guide to the most misunderstood country on earth should be in every high school in Canada, despite its frequent use of F-bombs or maybe because of them. Tishby’s book is a history of Israel from ancient times, a portrait of contemporary Israel, and most of all, a passionate defence of one of the world’s most dynamic countries.

Israel’s a colonial state, say its detractors. Ridiculous, says Tishby. Jews are indigenous to Israel. “I can personally read the letters on pieces of clay on top of the fortress of Masada from two thousand years ago” –because these ancient inscriptions are written in our language, in Hebrew, in a land where Jews first formed a kingdom more than three thousand years ago.  

Moreover, Tishby points out, only 31% of Israel’s population descends from Europeans returning to our homeland. The rest, Jewish and Arab, are of more immediate Middle Eastern descent.

Israel’s an apartheid state? Hardly, says Tishby. All Israelis have equal rights under the law. “The third largest political party in the Israeli parliament is an Arab party,” says Tishby. “Arabs serve in the IDF {Israeli Defecnce Forces}, and they are part of the judiciary system, academia, entertainment, and medical fields – all of it.”

Tishby writes about how much Israel gives to the world. Most people know, Israeli tech is in practically every device we use. But Israel makes an outsize contribution to the world in every walk of life, from medicine to agriculture to entertainment. Before Homeland (yes, based on an Israeli TV series), before Shtisel, before Fauda, Tishby herself began the flood of Israeli shows into the international market by selling In Treatment to HBO.

When an international disaster hits, Israel is often the first on the ground – though Israel’s help sometimes needs to be accepted in secret. Throughout Syria’s horrific civil war, 200,000 Syrians have been treated by Israeli doctors (both Jewish and Arab of course), although Syria has always been in a state of war against Israel, and Syrians have been bathed in generations of antisemitic propaganda.

Israel, Tishby writes, has a lot to give the Middle East, “If only the Middle East would be willing to fucking take it. … Why can’t more Yazidi woman come to Israel to be helped, without being afraid of being killed when they go back to Iraq?”

Noa Tishby and son Ari

I did mention Tishby drops a lot of F-bombs. But a hundred years of animosity toward Israel might exasperate anyone – indeed, it should exasperate us all. Plus, Tishby’s been an online activist for past 12 years and founded Act for Israel, an online advocacy organization. Given that she deals with the anti-Israel craziness of the online world all the time, I think Tishby should be forgiven as many F-bombs as she wants to drop. 

Carried along by her style, passion, and knowledge, any reader will enjoy Tishby’s Israel. But clearly she’s written this book with the uniformed and the misinformed in mind and most especially for university and college students.

Thus, Tishby devotes a whole chapter to BDS – the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement that aims to shun Israelis and cast them out of the human family – a movement that’s based on college campuses and specifically aims to recruit young people.

Tishby tells about how BDS does inflict financial damage, but not on Israelis, on Palestinians who’d love to work for well-paying Israeli companies devoted to equality such as SodaStream. Unfortunately, BDS drove SodaStream out of the West Bank.  

Tishby writes how BDS obscures its aims; namely to wipe Israel off the map and replace it with a Palestinian state, “from the river to the sea,” to quote their favourite slogan. And she details how “some of BDS’s most significant [financial] supporters … are also supporters of Hamas.”

Indeed, says, Tishby, “The BDS US campus operation represents a savvy rebranding of the Palestinian cause to make it more palatable – and you know, less terror-y – for the American people.”

We know the same is true for Canada. While Hamas explicitly proclaims it wants to kill Jews, BDS seeks to dehumanize Israelis and portray “Zionists” as people who deserve whatever terrorism they get.

Unfortunately, these days it’s not only university students who get fed anti-Israel propaganda. High school students now often face the same hatred, dressed up as Palestinian rights. Like university students, high school students need to understand the nature of the attack, and the truth about Israel.

Tishby’s book is ideally suited to the need. Not only because it speaks to the right issues, but because she’s passionate also on behalf of the Palestinians, too. Free Gaza. Yes, Tishby agrees. From Hamas! And let’s figure out how to help Palestinians who want to actually build a Palestinian state, not just get rid of Israel. And like so many, many Israelis, Tishby fondest dream is for peace.

But most of all Tishby’s Israel is right for young people because she speaks from the heart, not just about the facts and the history, but about her own experience and her family. And, yes, she drops a lot of F-bombs, but for my money, that just make her someone who’s easy to relate to – and she would’ve been just as easy to relate back when I was back in high school.

***

Brian Henry is a writer, an editor, and the publisher of the Quick Brown Fox blog. He teaches writing courses for adults and has written book reviews for the Toronto Star and for Books in Canada, and opinion pieces for the Toronto Star and the National Post. He was also a regular contributor to the (now defunct) Jewish Tribune and to the Engage and Harry’s Place websites in the UK. 

This review was also published in the TheJ.ca here.

Note: Quick Brown Fox welcomes your book reviews – or any kind of review of anything, of anywhere or of anybody. If you want to review your favourite coffee shops or libraries, babysitters or lovers (no real names please), go for it. See examples of book reviews here (and scroll down); other reviews here (and scroll down). Read about how to write a book review here.

QBF also welcomes essays about a favourite book or about your experience of reading or writing. To get a taste of what other writers have done, see here and scroll down).

Submit to: brianhenry@sympatico.ca

Include a short bio at the end of your piece and attach a photo of yourself if you have one that’s okay.

Thursday, April 7, 2022

“Faculty at the University of Toronto fight back against antisemitism” by Brian Henry

 

Irwin Cotler

Antisemites and Israel-hater would like Jews to just shut up. So it warms my heart when I see the Jewish community fighting back – which is what’s happening at the University of Toronto. There 339 Jewish professors have signed a letter to the Dean of the Temerty Faculty of Medicine calling out the antisemitism of some of their fellow faculty members.

It all started back in January when Irwin Cotler – possibly Canada’s foremost defender of human rights – gave a talk on Contemporary Antisemitism for the UofT’s Temerty Faculty of Medicine (see here). Cotler observed that, rather than accusing individual Jews of being the enemy of all that is good, contemporary antisemites have shifted their hatred to the Jewish state as the embodiment of evil.

Individual Jews in turn get attacked for supporting Israel. To clear their names, antisemites demand Jews declare that they too see Israel as demonic – as racist, colonial, apartheid, Nazi-like, baby-murdering, etc. And if Jews decline to repeat the antisemitic creed, then they, too, must be demons.

A former law school professor, Minister of Justice, and currently serving as Canada’s Special Envoy for Holocaust Remembrance and Antisemitism, Cotler phrased things with more nuance and went into far more detail on the antisemitic trends we’ve seen gaining traction, especially in the past two decades. 

Delegates to the UN's 2001 World Conference Against Racism

He also spoke about the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism, which he had a hand in drafting, and which calls out this new antisemitism. 

For Israel-hating faculty at the UofT, all this was too much.

Forty-five of them wrote a letter to the Dean of the Faculty of Medicine, calling Cotler an anti-Palestinian racist. Not that Cotler said a single word against Palestinians, but he had the nerve to point out the kind of antisemitism practiced by some people who like to call themselves progressive.

The anti-Israel profs were particularly incensed that Cotler discussed the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism. A committee looking into antisemitism at the UofT’s school of medicine had recommended against adopting this definition of antisemitism (or any other definition). The anti-Israel profs seem to think this means the definition must not be talked about.

It would indeed be convenient for some if Jews were no longer allowed to talk about antisemitism.

This isn't the first time in recent months that we’ve seen Israel-haters trying to shut up a Jew objecting to antisemitism. Back in December, Toronto School Board Trustee Alexandra Lulka was investigated by the school board and faced a formal motion of censure for anti-Palestinian racism. Not because she’d said a word against Palestinians, but because she’d objected to a teacher distributing material that was grossly antisemitic and that praised terrorism and terrorists. See here.

Toronto School Board Trustee Alexandra Lulka

Cotler also annoyed the anti-Israel faculty because he had the nerve to point out that the United Nations has an Israel obsession, with the UN’s Human Rights Council passing far more resolutions against Israel than for all the rest of the world combined, as if North Korea, China, Iran, and Russia were gardens of delight, while all evil in the world comes from a sliver of a country that happens to be the world’s one Jewish state. 

Of course, Israel must observe human rights, the same as every state, said Cotler. But the same as every state.

Clearly Israel is being held to a different standard entirely.

Cotler also had the nerve to call out the United Nations’ 2001 World Conference Against Racism for itself sinking into racism. Cotler knows what he’s talking about, as he was at that conference representing Canada, and recounted how it devolved into a “festival of hate” against Jews.

Twenty years later, Cotler is still clearly shocked by what he experienced at that conference, with “Jewish students being assaulted and being told, you don’t belong to the human race.”

UofT’s anti-Israel faculty describe this conference as “legitimate criticism of Israel.”

Finally, much to the annoyance of UofT’s anti-Israel faculty, Cotler had the nerve to dismiss the claim that Israel practices apartheid. Again, unlike the anti-Israel crowd, Cotler knows what he’s talking about. He was part of Nelson Mandela’s legal team. Indeed, his talk to the UofT’s faculty of medicine happened to take place on the 41st anniversary of Cotler’s arrest by South Africa's apartheid government. 

Not content with calling Cotler racist, the UofT profs also smeared the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies, which was a sponsor of Cotler’s talk.

According to the anti-Israel profs, the FSWC “has actively targeted colleagues of colour.”

Irwin Cotler and South African President Jacob Zuma

They were referring to an incident in which some UofT students had called for Dr. Ritika Goel to be fired from her position as the faculty of medicine’s Justice, Anti-Oppression and Advocacy Theme Lead. 

In social media posts, Dr. Gael has championed the movement to boycott Israel, while referring to support of Israel as “#BarbaricCulturalPractices.” And sharing a post showing former Prime Minister Stephen Harper as a puppet controlled by SodaStream, an Israeli carbonated water company. Jews as puppeteers is a long-standing antisemitic motif. 

Though her social media posts were from a number of years ago, they convinced Jewish students that Dr. Gael was not appropriate for an anti-oppression role. The FSWC supported them. It had nothing to do with her being “a person of colour.”

As Jews are not in fact puppeteers secretly pulling the strings of power, Dr. Gael kept her position as Anti-Oppression Lead.

The letter of complaint about Cotler’s talk from 45 anti-Israel faculty, prompted Jewish faculty to write their own letter (see here) to the Dean of the faculty of medicine, led by Dr. Frank Sommers, co-founder of Doctors Against Racism and Antisemitism (DARA).

Signed by 339 Jewish faculty at the UofT, the letter calls out their colleagues’ “falsehoods, twisted logic and antisemitic rhetoric.”

In their complaint to the Dean, the Jewish faculty concluded:

“Taken in its entirety, their letter is an example of the very antisemitism that Mr. Cotler dismantled in his presentation. Naturally the other Faculty members don’t like being exposed. That is why they have attacked Mr. Cotler. Sadly, Jews have had to live with this kind of hostility for centuries.”

The Dean could not ignore 339 Jewish faculty, not entirely. She replied politely pointing out various measures against antisemitism taken by the faculty of medicine, but also saying she couldn’t comment on the letter from the anti-Israel faculty because it wasn’t an “open letter” thus, theoretically private, despite having been seen by thousands.

*** 

Brian Henry is a writer, editor, creative writing instructor, and publisher of the Quick Brown Fox blog. He’s written opinion pieces for the National Post and the Toronto Star. He was also a regular contributor to the (now defunct) Jewish Tribune and the Engage and Harry’s Place websites in the UK.

"Faculty at the University of Toronto fight back against antisemitism" previously appeared in TheJ.ca.